|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
26-10-2012, 01:51 PM
|
#10 | ||
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 67
|
The suggestion that OHC is modern technology is laughable...check the history books.
OHV vs OHC - positive and negatives for both. On V and flat configurations OHC can present packaging issues. Inline engines not a major problem. When it comes to variable cam timing & multi valves OHC has the advantage, its a bit harder to control exhaust and inlet timing independantly with a single cam. Its great GM is sticking with push-rods, another easy-fit option for resto-modding something old. |
||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Re: GM Sticks with Pushrods
Threaded Mode