|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
31-10-2007, 04:56 PM
|
#36 | ||
|
Hoon (I wish!)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 411
|
I don't think I've ever said that Wheels or Motor is biased in 0-100 tests, but sometimes SOME of the writers seem to nitpick at things and put smaller things in bigger consideration than big important things (urggh, the seatbelt felt rather uncomfortable). However, I do believe that sometimes Holden gets more exposure in Wheels and Motor - intentional or not. It is just annoying getting issue after issue with another Holden on the front (thankfully this issue was an exception). This is probably due to either
1. Biased cover designers 2. Clever marketing who wants to get more sales. BUT, Holdens have generally been faster in 0-100 tests - and haven't they been caught out modifying a test car before? Or is that just a myth?
__________________
I want an FG!  : If only I were old enough : |
||
|
|
Threaded Mode