Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2014, 02:43 AM   #31
PlukaDuck
Regular Member
 
PlukaDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 341
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpblue1000 View Post
we should be building wind turbines, or packaged power generators or trains or ships, flat pack houses, bridges. High value, complex, technological items where the labour cost and vagaries of international currency is partially irrelevant. We should be building things others cant and not giving our secrets away so they can build it after buying one.
Australians can make stuff, just not mass produced cars profitably. we need to think smart about building what others cant or wont.

JP
Unfortunately your mentality is why Australia is going downhill.
ALL your above mentioned are uneconomical and unsustainable.
By the way what are the things we can build that others can't ?????????
FOOTBALL....MEATPIES...KANGAROO'S ...and HOLDEN CARS.
OOOPS forget the holden cars
__________________
NA ( normally aspirated )5.9 LITRE SMALLBLOCK.... 570KW / 740NM.
PlukaDuck is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-02-2014, 08:31 AM   #32
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

[QUOTE=PlukaDuck;5018496]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spammy View Post

Spammy.
Your dreaming if you think a merc and a BMW is ALL THAT.
There taxis in Europe. Just like the falcon and commodore is here.
Another example of a mislead ausrtralian believing he is something special because he drives a car that an advertisement says makes him special if he drives it.
Here is a link to your overpriced EURO TRASH being flogged to death by American muscle
http://www.streetfire.net/video/corv...ago_701287.htm

Thanks mate- I have owned 3x BMWs and my brother has had 2x Mercs so I sort of know what they are like.

I also lived in Europe for 3 years so am amare of the fact Mercs are used as Taxis.

Any other advice for me before I start my day?? I need to tie my shoe laces--- do people in Europe tie their laces?? Got a link for me so I can learn more on the topic??

Do you have a newsletter I can subscibe to ...you seem to have a lot of very fwd thinking ideas and I"m keen to learn from you.
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-02-2014, 09:39 AM   #33
jpblue1000
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpblue1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,252
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlukaDuck View Post
Unfortunately your mentality is why Australia is going downhill.
ALL your above mentioned are uneconomical and unsustainable.
By the way what are the things we can build that others can't ?????????
FOOTBALL....MEATPIES...KANGAROO'S ...and HOLDEN CARS.
OOOPS forget the holden cars
Whatever!

JP
jpblue1000 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-02-2014, 09:50 AM   #34
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,764
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlukaDuck View Post
ROAD-WARRIOR.......Great post.
Problem is Australians consumers need to set the terms.
If they buy a foreign car rather than say a Locally built ford territory then
sooner or later they will stop making the territory here.
At the end of the day the consumer dictates the market.
Australians are bringing this all on themselves.
Best-selling SUVs in January
1. Holden Captiva - 2155 . ............Foreign
2. Mazda CX-5 - 1625 ............Foreign
3. Hyundai ix35 - 1301 ............Foreign
4. Nissan X-Trail - 1294. ...........Foreign
5. Subaru Forester - 1246 ............Foreign
6. Ford Territory - 1161
7. Honda CR-V - 1117. ...........Foreign
8. Toyota Prado - 1048 ............Foreign
9. Nissan Dualis - 1033. ...........Foreign
10. Toyota Kluger - 960. ...........Foreign

[QUOTE=DoreSlamR]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlukaDuck
1. Holden Captiva - 2155

Scary.

This is one of the reasons why the Australia car industry is gone to the dogs.

I'd hazard a guess the Craptiva is the cheapest SUV option?

Do people not test drive cars back to back anymore? It is the worst built out of the 10, yet is the best seller.........

I would love to see a survey of new car buyers, see what goes through their heads when purchasing. Not a lot for some I suspect!
sorry, but i can't agree that consumers have made much of an impact at all. the factories need volume. even if territory was the top seller, and sold double the amount of the current top seller, it still wouldn't be enough volume to keep the doors open.

the real issue is, how did australia come to have so much choice in the market, and at prices that make it impossible to compete locally? that is the issue, and it all started many years ago now. without industry protection on a higher level, it was doomed.

tariffs needed to be at least 10% and probably closer to 15 or 20. free trade agreements needed to be a 2 way street.

no point pointing fingers at any one government either, as this all started some years ago. i bet all those who cheered about the extra choice in the market and the cheaper prices are now scratching their heads at why the industry has folded.
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
3 users like this post:
Old 11-02-2014, 03:55 PM   #35
zilo
BANNED
 
zilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,886
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spammy View Post
All of those brands have very long and well regarded pedigrees --- name me a few start ups that have managed to survive, be profitable and grow beyond a cottage industry in the auto industry.


How about the only manufacturer that has orders up to TWO years in advance? and has been heavily invested in by Mercedes and Toyota?

And has a model that can do 0-100 in 3.9s?



TESLA.
zilo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-02-2014, 04:10 PM   #36
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zilo View Post



TESLA.
And lost $38m last year.
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 11-02-2014, 07:00 PM   #37
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,037
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

And if you read into it, Tesla have done a alot of 'shifting of the deckchairs' to make things look more rosey than they are.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-02-2014, 02:44 AM   #38
zilo
BANNED
 
zilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,886
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spammy View Post
And lost $38m last year.

LOL...how much have Ford/GM/Toyota lost?

38m is lunch money.
zilo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-02-2014, 08:20 AM   #39
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zilo View Post
LOL...how much have Ford/GM/Toyota lost?

38m is lunch money.
Maybe think about how many cars each of those comnpanies made and divide the loss by that number as a way of comparision.

Or would that not be logical -- help me out here, you seem to know more than me.
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-02-2014, 10:15 AM   #40
zilo
BANNED
 
zilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,886
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spammy View Post
Maybe think about how many cars each of those comnpanies made and divide the loss by that number as a way of comparision.

Or would that not be logical -- help me out here, you seem to know more than me.
I don't see any plant closure announcements yet, can't simplify it any more than that for you.
zilo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-02-2014, 02:23 PM   #41
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Given they only ever built 1 of the 3 plants they had planned it makes it a bit hard to shut many down.
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL