|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
20-08-2014, 04:04 PM | #31 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 130
|
Mazda shared development costs, all the Engineering/Testing work was done by Ford.
|
||
20-08-2014, 04:12 PM | #32 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,914
|
Ford and Mazda had separate design teams both working in Broady. Ford released the body and trim parts and the powertrain. It think elextrical was Ford too. Mazda had responsibility for chassis, suspension and steering. Fuel system was split. Ford ran all vehicle testing and drove suspension tune etc.
All Mazda and Ford for Asia are built in the same AAT plant in Thailand but Fords are also built in South Africa and South America for other markets |
||
This user likes this post: |
20-08-2014, 04:14 PM | #33 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,914
|
unladen the 2.2 has ample power and torque. It does struggle a little fully laden and highway towing at GTM means you have to shift down on inclines. The auto does have reported pullaway issues but the finger is pointing to the torque converter lockup as the culprit not the engine. Later models should have this improved.
|
||
20-08-2014, 05:18 PM | #34 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,040
|
Yeah the 2.2 still has more grunt than a Hilux. Even when unladen you have to shift down in the Toyota.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170 2004 BA wagon RTV project. 1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red 1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired 1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project. |
||
This user likes this post: |
20-08-2014, 08:04 PM | #35 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 130
|
Quote:
But drive it back to back with the Big Brother 3.2 or 3.0 Navara and it feels like an asthmatic 4 cylinder. |
|||
21-08-2014, 08:24 PM | #36 | ||
Starting out with the V8
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 62
|
With these crew cabs being increasingly bought by families, how well do they accommodate tethered child seats?
With the new rules in NSW children are in car seats till 7 years of age which means many family’s like ours need 3 child seat anchor points, or the threads to attach them to like Falcon has. Can anyone confirm if the Ranger can handle the third seat legally, or are the Territory and the Falcon the only ones in the Ford Line up that can?
__________________
Hers: 2006 SY Territory Turbo (Sold) His: 2006 BF XR6 Turbo (Sold) Hers: 2015 Kluger Grande His: 2015 FGX XR8 Kinetic |
||
21-08-2014, 08:28 PM | #37 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,914
|
Ranger has two top tethers as standard, but if you look in the Ranger sub-forum I'm sure people have added a third. You need an engineer's report but it can be done.
Focus has 3 tether points so there's certainly more options than just Territory or Falcon |
||
21-08-2014, 09:08 PM | #38 | ||
Starting out with the V8
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 62
|
Thanks for the quick reply Simon, it's disappointing from ford though, if you already owned the car and had another child fair enough modify it. Modifying would be cheaper than selling for something else.
But no one with 3 kids under 7, wants to spend 50k+ on a new vehicle of any type (from what i understand Toyota a just as bad, with the Land Cruiser), only to have to have a third anchor point added, and go to the trouble of having it engineered. It should be in the design brief when they first start thinking about what the product must have considering the widening demographic buying these cars. I had to laugh when you said Focus has 3, that highlights how important the requirement for them is.
__________________
Hers: 2006 SY Territory Turbo (Sold) His: 2006 BF XR6 Turbo (Sold) Hers: 2015 Kluger Grande His: 2015 FGX XR8 Kinetic |
||