|
14-12-2012, 09:28 AM | #61 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,922
|
I owned a XF years ago but always wanted a VL. They were cooler lookin and quicker stock for stock.
But nothing could beat a XF rear seat for the drive ins with some chick. |
||
14-12-2012, 10:41 AM | #62 | |||
AFF Whore
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: In between gas stations
Posts: 2,246
|
Quote:
Educate rather than legislate is my motto. |
|||
14-12-2012, 01:15 PM | #63 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 3,926
|
Quote:
My old man sold his VL earlier this year. It's now up in Emerald. The bloke flew down and drove it back up. Pretty crazy to drive it over 2000kms after it hadn't been driven for about 5 years. |
|||
This user likes this post: |
14-12-2012, 03:06 PM | #64 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
|
I firmly believe that VL's have aged far better than VN/VP's have...a clean VL will still draw your eye on the street, especially if it was a Calais with that great front end and the pop up headlights. The best one I saw recently was a light metallic green coloured VL (just an Executive or something, not a Calais), dark tint, lowered, on 16" steel interceptor wheels with low profile tyres. It just looked "right". I've also seen a bright yellow one done the same, and it too looked good.
Most VN/VP's you see, unless they are a well maintained SS or something, just look like run-down crap nowadays...even the ones that have had an effort made to look after them have dated badly, and the plastics (of which there were a lot on the car) just haven't held up. |
||
14-12-2012, 04:12 PM | #65 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 3,926
|
Quote:
|
|||