Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2012, 05:35 PM   #91
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,398
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

An example the other way... Chrysler takes on HSV and FPV......
American performance hero monsters local pair with 347kW of power and more equipment for less money.




jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-07-2012, 06:32 PM   #92
2011G6E
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
2011G6E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAGPIE
Not sure why you would want to put an old I6T in the Mustang, it already comes with a sweet purpose built V8 and it is currently lighter than any Falcon bar the Ecoboost
Because people are realists?
V8's cost way more to register (in a lot of places), more to run, more to service, more to buy. People would love to be able to get the style, but people generally don't care what's under the bonnet in any great detail nowadays.
2011G6E is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-07-2012, 07:54 PM   #93
MAGPIE
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MAGPIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Shakey Isles
Posts: 3,428
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2011G6E
Because people are realists?
V8's cost way more to register (in a lot of places), more to run, more to service, more to buy. People would love to be able to get the style, but people generally don't care what's under the bonnet in any great detail nowadays.
Yep that's why the Mustang has a six

Still can't see why you'd want the I6T from the Falcon
MAGPIE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-07-2012, 10:23 PM   #94
Pandemic
Regular Member
 
Pandemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 52
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
An example the other way... Chrysler takes on HSV and FPV......
American performance hero monsters local pair with 347kW of power and more equipment for less money.




image
Hopefully thats a start with more competitive pricing in Australia.

Meaning cheaper cars... Am I imagining something that'll never happen?
Pandemic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 01:08 AM   #95
chevypower
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford_The_Win
Well I'm not sure about driving dynamics or tech (US Fords certainly have the edge tech-wise) but having seen a new Fusion up close, the build quality is still very uncompetitive, even new with locally built Fords. Lots of horrible plastic and molding marks that just aren't acceptable in this day and age.

This is why American built cars never do very well outside of the US (since the 80s at least). This is a screenshot from a video of the new Chrysler 300 I saw on youtube. When they still have poor quality like this, there's no chance of competing. A European or Japanese customer would never accept that.

image
That doesn't appear to be the current model 300. My 2005 F150 has as at least as good quality of an interior as any Australian Falcon or Commodore I've had. These comparisons are stupid. Sure, a few years ago, American interiors sucked. So did paint jobs on BMWs in the 1990s. Stop looking at old model American cars and comparing them to current model cars built elsewhere. Well do it if you must, but just don't expect others to buy into it.

Current model 300 interior: http://0.tqn.com/d/cars/1/0/D/R/2/ag_11300_intlt.JPG Yeah, a Camry interior is soooo much better!
chevypower is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 02:16 AM   #96
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,398
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandemic
Hopefully thats a start with more competitive pricing in Australia.

Meaning cheaper cars... Am I imagining something that'll never happen?
Can't see FPV dropping the GT's price to match the 300 SRT8
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 06:56 AM   #97
Moby Vic
Cynical Idealist
 
Moby Vic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by TC200six
I've been led to believe the '96 Taurus was a complete lemon plus it looked like an extra terrestrial on our roads. It was also during a time when the Falcon was the cheapest car to repair so it's not surprising the Falcon was considered better, but that was 16 years ago. The current Falcon lacks the electrical gimmicks the current Taurus offers, so as I said earlier, if ever the Falcon was sold in the US the way it is here, it would need to be offered as a budget vehicle there.
Interesting bit about the '96 Taurus—it was the debut of Jack Telnack's "New Edge" styling on a production car. The GT90 show car also demonstrated the philosophy. Clearly it didn't appeal to everyone in that form, but by the time the Focus debuted, Ford had it right.

New Edge was Telnack's last hurrah. The original Taurus, which was an international styling sensation, was introduced under his watch. Telnack was the guy responsible for the aero look craze of the '80s. Ford's first aero car was the Tempo. The styling looked much better on Thunderbirds, though.

Anyway, if you think Telnack was a hack, I must remind you that he started his Ford career in Australia. In fact, he styled the 427 Falcon two-door show car (built from an American '66–'67 Falcon Futura coupe) that debuted at the 1969 Melbourne Motor Show. It introduced the Shaker hood and the Super Roo logo.

It's a small world, after all.
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with!
Moby Vic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 07:12 AM   #98
brett7777
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
brett7777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,276
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moby Vic
Anyway, if you think Telnack was a hack, I must remind you that he started his Ford career in Australia. In fact, he styled the 427 Falcon two-door show car (built from an American '66–'67 Falcon Futura coupe) that debuted at the 1969 Melbourne Motor Show. It introduced the Shaker hood and the Super Roo logo.

It's a small world, after all.
Interesting!
__________________
Current:
Toyota JZX90 Mark II Tourer V 1JZ-GTE
Nissan Fairlady 350Z
Nissan Skyline 370GT Coupe
Previous:
FPV BF F6 Typhoon #202
BF XR6 Rebel

Founder of BA & BF FORD FALCON FACEBOOK GROUP
brett7777 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 07:16 AM   #99
brett7777
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
brett7777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,276
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpd80
An example the other way... Chrysler takes on HSV and FPV......
American performance hero monsters local pair with 347kW of power and more equipment for less money.
image
but it looks like a brick with wheels
__________________
Current:
Toyota JZX90 Mark II Tourer V 1JZ-GTE
Nissan Fairlady 350Z
Nissan Skyline 370GT Coupe
Previous:
FPV BF F6 Typhoon #202
BF XR6 Rebel

Founder of BA & BF FORD FALCON FACEBOOK GROUP
brett7777 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 09:37 AM   #100
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,398
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by brett7777
but it looks like a brick with wheels
Yes it does, it's apparently the style that US buyers like. A big car has to look big and
that's why American car makers build their large sedan as an imposing "block of flats".

See, that's the difference with our Falcon and Commodore, they're big on the inside
but much more compact on external dimensions compared to say, the 300 or even Taurus.
It's also why a lot of American consumers are quick to mislabel our large cars as mid sizers...

So when we talk to our American cousins about a large or full size sedan, we need
to think Fairlane/Caprice not Falcon/Commodore which are actually like "fence sitters"

Last edited by jpd80; 12-07-2012 at 09:44 AM.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 09:47 AM   #101
Moby Vic
Cynical Idealist
 
Moby Vic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

I never liked the first generation of the 300 (the one from this millennium). It looked like they took a proper large car and blunted the front and rear ends with a hot iron.

I think they've improved the rear with the refreshed version, but the front is still too blunt and the grille now reminds me of a Hyundai (I can't remember if it's the Genesis or Equus).

Chrysler made such a bold move with both the 300 and Charger because they're a desperate niche player in the US. Ford still sells enough volume to play it safer with styling (witness the incredibly bland Five Hundred that has now morphed into the aggressive-looking Taurus). Of course Ford has bet the company on daring designs before—the original Taurus is the most recent example, but the '49 Ford was nearly as revolutionary (and the V8 and Model A prior to that).

Chrysler has notoriously cheap interiors. They've actually improved vastly since they were given to Fiat. Sergio approved something like an additional $11 per car for the interior.

Daimler officials couldn't believe that Chrysler could actually produce interiors as cheaply as they did—they thought the dollar value was a typographical error.

US GM and Ford interiors are marginally better than Chrysler interiors. Trucks actually tend to have nice interiors these days.

Personally, I don't mind the plastic—I'd rather spend my money on the engine and suspension. The Mustang interior is as nice as it has ever been, but Ford (and even magazine reviews) bragged about ehe 2005 interior, yet it was clearly much cheaper (hard, hollow plastic) than the interior of my '95.

The EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) actually classes cars based on interior volume, not exterior dimensions. That's why a Mustang is considered a subcompact.

But with the death of the Panther platform, there isn't really a traditional full-sized car still in the US market (even though the Panthers didn't really have that much interior room).
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with!
Moby Vic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 02:47 PM   #102
Ford_The_Win
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,730
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevypower
That doesn't appear to be the current model 300. My 2005 F150 has as at least as good quality of an interior as any Australian Falcon or Commodore I've had. These comparisons are stupid. Sure, a few years ago, American interiors sucked. So did paint jobs on BMWs in the 1990s. Stop looking at old model American cars and comparing them to current model cars built elsewhere. Well do it if you must, but just don't expect others to buy into it.
This is the video I took it from. One year old... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jCgBuLlCNo
__________________
2011 FG XR6 Sedan
Ford_The_Win is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 03:31 PM   #103
TC200six
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brisbane, Qld
Posts: 3,321
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moby Vic
Interesting bit about the '96 Taurus—it was the debut of Jack Telnack's "New Edge" styling on a production car. The GT90 show car also demonstrated the philosophy. Clearly it didn't appeal to everyone in that form, but by the time the Focus debuted, Ford had it right.
As much as the new edge styling looked ugly back then, whenever I see a Taurus on the road today, they blend in really well with the rest of the traffic. Maybe Telnack was ahead of his time.
TC200six is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 05:45 PM   #104
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,398
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by TC200six
As much as the new edge styling looked ugly back then, whenever I see a Taurus on the road today, they blend in really well with the rest of the traffic. Maybe Telnack was ahead of his time.
Even Ford US recognised that they stuffed it up by making it look like a foot ball,
Jay Mays took over from Telnac and tried to even out look,




jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 06:19 PM   #105
DFB FGXR6
Donating Member
Donating Member3
 
DFB FGXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,885
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: For the excellent car-care guide 
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

My opinion on "New Edge" was it didnt really work on larger cars. Its use on smaller cars such as the Focus, Ka, Cougar and Puma was quite resolved and suited the target audience for these vehicles. New Edge on larger cars didnt suit the more mature and conservative nature of the people that would buy a Falcon or Tauris.
__________________
The Fleet -
2016 PX MK II Ranger Cool White
2008 FG XR6 Sensation Blue
2014 FG X XR8 Emperor Red
2024 Mustang GT Race Red

The Departed -
2002 T3 TS50 Blueprint
2017 Mustang GT Race Red
DFB FGXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 12-07-2012, 06:31 PM   #106
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,398
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: Why aren't Falcons sold in America ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by DFB FGXR6
My opinion on "New Edge" was it didnt really work on larger cars. Its use on smaller cars such as the Focus, Ka, Cougar and Puma was quite resolved and suited the target audience for these vehicles. New Edge on larger cars didnt suit the more mature and conservative nature of the people that would buy a Falcon or Tauris.
That's a fair call as the early D3 Fivehundred had a similar look as an enlarged Focus.




Ford's nth American and European styling has changed so much over the past decade it a wonder anyone can keep up..
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL