![]() |
|
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
Guess Who's Back?
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,369
|
Lincoln to get new products & targets Lexus. Could GRWD be back on the cards?
Quote:
__________________
The 18th Letter |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
Meep Meep
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southside
Posts: 1,513
|
Quote:
__________________
Thundering on.... |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||
Guess Who's Back?
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,369
|
Quote:
Edit: The Lincoln / Lexus connection makes me think of Mulally's reaction to driving the G6ET prototype: Quote:
__________________
The 18th Letter Last edited by R-Design; 03-06-2010 at 10:17 AM. |
||||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
|
Unique transmission, I see the ZF 8 speed (or a Ford-built 8 speed) for Lincoln, and not necessarily for Ford yet. Unique engine? 3.7L EcoBoost? 4.4L V8 diesel for the Navigator and ZF 8 speed like in the Range Rover maybe.
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
|
hrmmm...
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,094
|
Its about time they improved on Lincoln. There vehicles are rather boring compared to that of some of the Caddies that are out at the moment IMO.
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 219
|
Im not surprised.
I did however hire a Mercury Milan 4 weeks ago, for a week whilst in the States and apart from the stylish but illegible instuments, absolutely loved it - much to my surprise. Of the 5 cars I hired in the States I loved it the most - by far. High quality, taught body, firm ride and roomy - for its class. Styling though was inoffensive, no boring - and that probably sums up the brand too. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
The Vengeful One
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tazzy
Posts: 12,766
|
Good idea i believe, focus efforts on the big top Luxury brand, no point in having Mercury if its not doing anything for the company
__________________
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,876
|
Unfortunately not enough room for mid-tier brands nowadays especially as basic brands move upmarket and high-end brands move down into cheaper segments.
Mercury would have been squeezed from both sides - by better Ford products which can command a premium, and Lincoln's move into more fuel efficient or smaller size segments. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,621
|
Yeap the only good thing to come from Mercury was the cougar, and not the modern on but the 69/70's one!
__________________
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,848
|
a "GM is Dead" thread in V8Central would set a cat among the pigeons ! (referring, of course to the Mercury - Grand Marquis) ... or is that a pigeon among the cats ?
That GM, btw is the second nicest American Car I have ever driven |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
|
http://www.mercuryvehicles.com/allvehicles.asp
Just looking at that, it could be 1997, you can't tell. It certainly doesn't look current. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
Meep Meep
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southside
Posts: 1,513
|
Quote:
__________________
Thundering on.... |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
Guess Who's Back?
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,369
|
Quote:
__________________
The 18th Letter |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/08/11/r...lement-payout/
Quote:
__________________
Daniel |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |